Trims Agreement The Hindu

Browse or download the text of the TRIMs agreement in the Gateway legal texts Industrialised countries are pushing for the e-commerce agreement at the WTO, including the EU, the US, Canada, Australia and Japan, are quite ambitious in their intent. Indeed, Japan wants existing WTO agreements to also apply to e-commerce. Issues such as the free flow of data on computer servers without data location requirements, a permanent moratorium on customs, non-disclosure of the source code and the prohibition of forced transfer of technology should all be on the negotiating agenda. E-commerce remains a very asymmetrical space in which certain dominant entries have the potential to distort a level playing field. The definition and importance of e-commerce also varies from country to country. At the same time, India remains uncertain about its regulation of e-commerce, particularly with regard to foreign direct investment. The latest rules of e-commerce are a ham-handed exercise in regulatory overruns. You list arbitrary restrictions for exclusive product offers as well as deep discounts. In addition, a company that has to some extent an e-commerce reader cannot place its products on its platform. India must strike a balance in its own e-commerce policy before entering the global arena. Its position in favour of maintaining the traditional wto negotiating framework should be continued without addressing new issues beyond trade facilitation. E-commerce is not "extraneous" for trade, unlike Singapore tower themes like TRIMS, but its rules are still in the making and space is hectic.

Trade-related investment measures (TSTs) are a WTO agreement that protects foreign investment in third countries from discrimination. The WTO has been considered as an international trade body to help increase trade in goods and services between nations by removing various trade barriers, such as tariffs, subsidies and quotas. To this end, several trade agreements have been ratified over the years under the WTO. However, as has already been said, developing countries such as India and China may attempt to delay the implementation of these WTO agreements because of their disadvantaged economic status. They may continue to impose tariffs and quotas on goods and services to limit imports and encourage domestic producers who might otherwise be affected by lower prices or lower quality imports. India, for example, heavily subsidizes agriculture in the name of food security to protect its farmers. While local producers can be protected by protectionist barriers such as tariffs, consumers in India and China will have limited access to foreign products. The status of "developing country" allows a WTO member to apply for a temporary waiver from the obligations arising from various multilateral trade agreements ratified by the Organization. It was established in the early days of the WTO as a mechanism to provide respite for poor countries, while trying to adapt to a new global trade order marked by weaker trade barriers. Although countries such as India and China have requested a waiver from various WTO agreements, they have argued that their economic backwardness should be taken into account when it comes to the timing of the implementation of these agreements. The issue of agricultural subsidies, for example, is an issue on which rich and poor countries have had wide differences of opinion.

However, the WTO does not consider any of its members to be a developing country. Some countries may view themselves unilaterally as developing countries. For example, up to two-thirds of the WTO`s 164 members considered themselves developing countries. Trump`s criticism of the WTO is seen by many as opening a new front in his trade war with China.

פורסם בקטגוריה כללי. אפשר להגיע לכאן עם קישור ישיר.

סגור לתגובות.